View Poll Results: How many K's do you get out of tank of fuel?

Voters
1333. You may not vote on this poll
  • 300 - 350

    62 4.65%
  • 351 - 400

    96 7.20%
  • 401 - 450

    191 14.33%
  • 451 - 500

    222 16.65%
  • 501 - 550

    254 19.05%
  • 551 - 600

    217 16.28%
  • 600 +

    291 21.83%
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 1199

Thread: Fuel Economy - What do you get out of a tank? (3rd gens only)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Yes, its a Mitsi! vlad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    4,764

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Millenium7 View Post
    I don't go by how many litres I put in on that tank, I go by how many litres it took to refill the tank. Its usually about 60L (maybe as low as 55L) to an average of 450km. That's an optimistic 8km/L or 12.5L/100km

    A hell of a long way off some of the 10km/L or higher some people are quoting.

    Someone suggested theres a way to check if the O2 sensor is in need of replacing before actually replacing it?
    Hi Millenium, isn't the bolded sentence the same? Please read my post above. Also, 55/450*100 is 12.22L/100km and 60/450*100 is 13.33L/100km. That is the range I get in my 1700kg AWD Verada GTVi doing the daily to/from work/drop kids at school weaving through suburbia and city.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vlad View Post
    Hi Millenium, isn't the bolded sentence the same? Please read my post above. Also, 55/450*100 is 12.22L/100km and 60/450*100 is 13.33L/100km. That is the range I get in my 1700kg AWD Verada GTVi doing the daily to/from work/drop kids at school weaving through suburbia and city.
    No, the first is the previous tank of fuel i've just gone through, the second is the tank of fuel I have just filled up with. The former estimates how much was used and how far you got from it. The latter measures how far you drove, and then measures how much fuel was needed to refill the tank to the same mark. The former is not accurate as the fuel guage and reserve light won't come on at the same mark every time, the latter is as it measure exactly how much fuel was used, not how much fuel you think was used

    Confused? I am too
    Yours is an AWD which on average will burn a significant amount more than the FWD. I would expect a good 2km/L more just because of that

    Quote Originally Posted by Jakeys View Post
    Where did you read this? First I've heard of it, I would think having the car maintain the absolute minimum output to maintain your desired speed and sitting exactly on that marker instead of the inevitable tiny ups and downs from your own foot on the pedal would yield more efficiency.
    +1, CC will be more fuel efficient on flat surfaces as it doesn't fluctuate as much. I can see it being worse on inclines though as a drive can pre-empt the hill and slowly build/scrub speed earlier. Most of what I drive is pretty flat
    Last edited by Millenium7; 06-11-2013 at 12:31 PM.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts